Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Fair Value Measurements

 v2.3.0.11
Fair Value Measurements
 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
4.  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The carrying value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. The estimated fair values of the Company’s debt approximate their recorded values as of the balance sheet dates presented, based on level 2 inputs consisting of interest rates offered to the Company for loans of the same or similar remaining maturities and bearing similar risks.
Due to the absence of observable market quotes on the Company’s notes receivable from tribal governments (Note 5), tribal notes receivable are recorded and subsequently re-measured and adjusted periodically to estimated fair value based only on level 3 inputs as defined in ASC Topic 820. These level 3 inputs are based primarily on management’s estimates of expected cash flow streams, based on factors such as future interest rates, casino opening dates and discount rates.
The estimated casino opening dates used in the valuations take into account project-specific circumstances such as ongoing litigation, the status of required regulatory approvals, construction periods and other factors. Factors considered in the determination of an appropriate discount rate include discount rates typically used by gaming industry investors and appraisers to value individual casino properties in the appropriate regions, and discount rates produced by the widely-accepted Capital Asset Pricing Model (“CAPM”). The following key assumptions are used in the CAPM:
  •  
S&P 500, average benchmark investment returns (medium-term horizon risk premiums);
  •  
Risk free investment return equal to the trailing 10-year average for 90-day treasury bills;
  •  
Investment beta factor equal to the average of a peer group of similar entities in the hotel and gaming industry;
  •  
Project-specific adjustments based on the status of the project (i.e., litigation, regulatory approvals, tribal politics, etc.), and typical size premiums for “micro-cap” and “low-cap” companies.